By Busi Mavuso

There is much riding on the contents of tomorrow’s budget speech. Perhaps a little more this time because of a slide into full blown “junk” status, which is a very clear and present danger.

What I am expecting from an understandably exasperated Finance Minister in Tito Mboweni are some strong words against the state’s bloated wage bill and warnings about the continued bailing out of troubled state-owned enterprises. A valiant cause, but we are now at a point where details are needed of just what actions will be taken. We need the actual numbers; the speech will matter a whole lot less.

On the matter of the wage bill, Treasury indicated in the medium-term budget statement that it would find some R150bn in savings over the medium term and deliver details in the budget. Now these are savings that will no doubt have depended on negotiating steep reductions in the wage bill with unions. But in the four months since that promise, there has been little evidence that there has been any formal, let alone informal, talks with the ANC’s alliance partner, Cosatu, whose strength now lies predominantly in the public sector.

There’s a credibility risk of putting in anything when there is no firm position having been put to unions and no entering of negotiations at the bargaining council.

These are the sort of details that Moody’s Investors Services, the last ratings agency to have us hanging on by a thread to investment grade, will want to see from Treasury. My fear is that the speech along with the budget review documents will continue to walk a narrow tightrope of what is credible and what is not.

We’d best hope that the strong words from Minister Mboweni are indeed followed by his staff, who have in recent history proved risk averse against pencilling anything in that has not been politically agreed. And we know that the issue of public sector wages is a particularly hot potato.

Within political corridors, there is little to no political space for a meaningful shift on the expenditure side either as part of macroeconomic policy or indeed on specifics like public sector wages. The ANC NEC has not provided any kind of sign off for such. As such, all that is available is for Treasury staff is the matter of fiddling with what you can.

But it can’t be business as usual – there’s no tar left to continue kicking that can down the road.

With government revenues under pressure and expenditure at elevated levels, there’s simply no getting around focusing on matters such as the wage bill. But as business, we are mindful that a drastic cut in staffing numbers is undesirable in a climate of such heightened unemployment and low growth. It would only serve to further dampen demand in an economy that is in desperate need of its stimulatory effects.

To mitigate these perhaps unavoidable consequences on reduction – if not the amount of workers but their remuneration – as business we have already committed to participating in government’s R500bn infrastructure fund that would be hosted by the Development Bank of Southern Africa. This plan was mooted in Octobers medium-term budget speech; its details are urgent.

What’s been mooted in the market is the possibility of yet another VAT hike to boost falling revenues. With local elections more than a year away and other ANC contests further down the line, economists have suggested that there may be room for a rise. It’s a tiny window and one feels that it would be too politically damaging for the Presidency.

As regards to our state-owned enterprises, not enough can be said of the threat that these ailing giants pose to the sovereign and the future competitiveness of the economy. However, these past four months have seen some tough calls made, for example, placing South African Airways in business rescue. This does signal a change in government thinking. Long overdue it may have been, but it at least showed some level of a state facing up to some hard realities.

In much a similar vein, the fact that government is now willing to listen and accept that fixing the issue of load-shedding is more long-term nature is a welcome change. For a period of between 18 months and a full two years, Eskom will have to follow a schedule of load-shedding if the power utility is to finally overcome its maintenance backlog.

It will no doubt be a weight on the country’s growth prospects and may even possibly slide us into recession, but it would at least provide some level of certainty to the market. For the utility itself and its recently appointed chief executive officer, André de Ruyter, it allows space for an operational focus. Measures previously suggested to ease the pressure on Eskom include the energy regulation act to be amended to lift the licence exemption from 1MW to 10MW.

There’s certainly a shift in just how the state views its state-owned enterprises, but SAA, SA Express, Eskom and South African Post Office still all need financial support. Never mind the irritation that will be evident in Mboweni’s speech about these institutions, what we need to see is a long-term solution to this ever-present funding headache – with Eskom’s debt of more than R450bn being the most pressing emergency of all.

In this budget speech, it’s all about substance over spectacle. It will determine whether Moody’s takes action next month or gives the country another chance. The agency has already downgraded our growth forecast, which wasn’t surprising.

It’s a close-run thing of whether Moody’s will downgrade the country now or later in the year. What dictates whether it happens in March is whether the budget speech comes with substance to boost Treasury’s cause.

This article was first published on SABC News