27/10/2020 | By Admin
In mapping out SA’s recovery, much of the focus is on economic analysis but too little attention is paid to “unproductive behaviour” that needs to be fixed, Miriam Altman, director of Altman Advisory, told a BLSA special council meeting on Thursday. Though she serves as a commissioner on the National Planning Commission, Altman was speaking in her personal capacity. However, she says the NPC will soon be releasing a comprehensive economic review that it had been working on for the past few years.
The challenges we have, says Altman, are more about us not building and strengthening our institutions with human capacity.
“Almost every public effort that I’ve been part of has been characterised by stop start, stop start, and it shows in the way we have not been progressing as a country – and not just in the past 10 years but in the past 40.”
Some countries that were at similar stages to SA in the 1960s and 70s had progressed strongly because they invested in their people, she said. “They may still have problems, they may still have corruption, but they have progressed because they strengthened their institutions.”
Altman noted that SA did make significant progress in reducing poverty between 2001 and 2008 but today “it’s clear we’re not on the right track”, with important economic and social development indicators deteriorating. State capture had diminished state capacity – and this was the essence of our problems today because that in turn led to diminishing economic and fiscal capacity.
“We’re simply not moving in the right direction in so many areas.”
She highlighted revenue collection as the most important factor to get right. Increasing the tax take would lead to a smaller portion of the budget being allocated to interest payments and more funds would flow into development spending. This, she said, was perhaps not fully comprehended within the public service. But to get that right, the “unproductive behaviour” across all levels of government and in state institutions had to be rectified.
Infrastructure
Using infrastructure delivery as an example of how unproductive behaviour stymies progress, Altman highlighted a study the NPC conducted into public delivery around procurement and public management of the built environment. From January to September 2018, 17,599 tenders were published, but only 5,255 were awarded and 1.326 were cancelled. In the end, 10,132 were not awarded. The performance in 2020, she said, had not improved but “has actually got worse”.
“This is a very serious set of findings. This is what we need to sort out: our ability to procure and pull these through to award and implementation. Then, oversight and quality management need to happen.”
After ramping up, infrastructure spending had fallen since 2014, she said. “The main problem is infrastructure delivery. It is delivered mostly by SOEs and provincial and municipal governments. And only 2% is privately funded. Ideally we would want to see more private-public partnerships.”
Two core problems were municipal underspending of their budgets (which Altman said was about 50% in the past few years) and cost overruns. While corruption was a problem, that did not explain the underspending, she said, while listing the following as the most serious culprits of cost overruns.
Furthermore, Prasa had spent about R80bn over the past decade but only 50% of its coaches were operational and there had been a significant fall in its customer base.
In comparison, she pointed out that the renewable energy independent power producers’ procurement programme had brought an extra 6,422MW onto the grid with cost reductions in successive bidding rounds, attracting R210bn in private sector investment.
The quality of state spending was dysfunctional and not having the required impact on infrastructure development. Altman classified various state structures into three categories:
“It’s clear that many issued don’t stem from lack of funding – Prasa, for example,” she said, adding that the main factor that hindered progress included a lack of state capacity to develop and deliver in a built environment. “This has fallen in line the fall in economic growth. The top explanation for falling infrastructure investment is the deteriorating performance of SOEs.
“To develop, we need economic growth but that has to be underpinned by building institutional capacity. Much of the loss of capacity in the state could be blamed on state capture, which resulted in enormous loss of capacity in every corner of state. The state makes up 30% of economy and is critical to progress of country.
“While we keep looking at the top, big issues, at the heart of it is what we really need to focus on: the capacity of the state We cannot get around it.”
NPC review
The NPC review looked at state capacity to procure and oversee infrastructure projects in the context of procurement rules and procedures. “We looked at performance, governance and market structure. We were trying to think about the main constraints. Why are so many projects not followed through? What happens to stop them?”
A core reason the NPC review found, Altman said, was a lack professional capacity to oversee infrastructure projects – which took place mostly at provincial and municipal government levels, with underqualified people tasked with managing them.
Procurement rules were sometimes also a restraint because they were the same for infrastructure as they were for buying pens and pencils. “We do need to allow exceptions to procurement rules to roll out infrastructure effectively.” To counterbalance this, the office of the chief procurement officer needed to be strengthened, among other measures.
The NPC’s finding on SOEs, she said, were not surprising. “The study refers to uncertain policy expectations, precarious funding strategies, poor institutional accountability and poor governance.”
The review provides a framework on performance and governance that enables alignment to NDP aspirations and urges for the prioritisation of performance goals in SOEs and other entities that manage major infrastructure development.
She said focusing on performance improvements was urgent and should precede market reform. “The sequencing of change is incredibly important. Market reform requires significant capacity on the part of the state, on the part of the entity being reformed and on the part of the regulator.
“Market reform is a very sophisticated process and what you don’t want to see is private monopolies being formed or poorly done privatisation. That is what happens when you have a weak state. You don’t want is to introduce market reform and have a poorly functioning SOE respond to it; that may result in destruction.”
The first step to addressing these issues, she said, was to commit to adhering to the existing rules and frameworks so that adherence became the norm – many of these were largely being ignored. “At the most basic level, this refers to the strength of the board and executive leadership, and a commitment to governance and accountability.”
MTBPS
With the upcoming medium-term budget policy statement, Altman said the challenge was not specifically in the numbers but rather in the credibility of the pathway leading back to economic health.
The widening debt-GDP ratio was simply an indicator of underlying problems. “Treasury has been warning since 2017 that domestic risk renders forecasts of debt:GDP impossible.” Addressing those domestic risks were therefore critical.
The main risks include: SOE financial stability; municipal finance; a pathway for public personal remuneration; and revenue collection.
“It all eventually comes down to public management. It is essential to focus on leadership, capacity and oversight. I find that both in the state and private sector, these are not being focused on enough – the focus is more on market reform issues.”
06/02/2025
Government recognises the important role that municipalities have in reforming our energy and water sectors in particular, says BLSA CEO … continue reading
16/01/2025
Pretoria, 16 January 2025 – President Cyril Ramaphosa has today, 16 January 2025, convened with ministers and senior business leaders… continue reading
30/10/2024
BLSA commends Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana on a solid budget delivered with strained resources, striking a good balance between fiscal… continue reading
27/09/2024
It has been good to hear a change of tack from the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, with the… continue reading
13/09/2024
It is with great sadness that Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA) learned of the passing of former minister and political… continue reading
04/09/2024
While Women’s Month is behind us, we continue celebrating the phenomenal women at the helm of some of BLSA’s member… continue reading
30/08/2024
Although Women’s Month is almost over, there is always good reason to celebrate the exceptional women leaders who are associated… continue reading
28/08/2024
Although Women’s Month is almost over, there is always good reason to celebrate the exceptional women leaders who are associated… continue reading
22/08/2024
Although Women’s Month is almost over, there is always good reason to celebrate the exceptional women leaders who are associated… continue reading
29/02/2024
Johannesburg 29 February 2024 – Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA) welcomes the appointment of a permanent executive team at Transnet… continue reading
21/02/2024
Finance minister Enoch Godongwane delivered a strong budget that commits government to appropriate spending levels given the weak economic outlook. … continue reading
05/02/2024
BACSA confirmed as the primary point of contact for Business interaction with government on crime and corruption through government structures,… continue reading